Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Interim contact: do private and public law proceedings apply different criteria?
Simon Heaney, St John’s Buildings ChambersDecisions about interim contact are fraught with difficulty. Judges are asked to decide and sanction arrangements when they don’t have all of the information,...
Who is the true wife? The recognition of overseas marriage and divorce
Dr Ruth Gaffney-Rhys, Senior Lecturer in Family Law, UWE Bristol In Uchechukwu-Onwukibo v Onwukibo and others [2023] EWHC 2812 (Fam) the Family Division of the High Court had to...
Daniels v Walker – the baseline
Nick Power, BarristerJosephine Garvey, BarristerAn analysis of the court's approach to the instruction of single joint experts and second experts pursuant to Daniels v Walker within financial remedy...
Narcissism in family law – what you need to know and why
Karin Walker, KGW Family LawNarcissism has increasingly been used as a term to describe anyone who demonstrates difficult or undesirable behaviour. In reality it is a very specific personality...
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025: entries open with four new categories announced
The LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 are officially open for entries, offering a platform to celebrate the very best of the UK’s legal talent. This year’s awards will feature four exciting new...
View all articles
Authors

Secure accommodation and the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court

Sep 29, 2018, 18:59 PM
Title : Secure accommodation and the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court
Slug : Farquharson-FebFLJ2014-195
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jan 22, 2014, 02:04 AM
Article ID : 104527

Jo Farquharson and Gail Hadley, Barristers, Colleton Chambers, Exeter

Susan Campbell QC, Pump Court Chambers, London

Does the High Court have the power under its inherent jurisdiction to authorize the detention of a young person in secure accommodation where that person cannot be secured under section 25 of the Children Act 1989?

Where statute does not cover that young person's circumstances permitting a section 25 order, but the High Court considers she should be secured in her own best interests, can the High Court authorize secure accommodation notwithstanding the lack of statutory power? Just how far-reaching are the "theoretically limitless" powers of the High Court once a young person has become a Ward of Court? Three barristers from the Western Circuit encountered this problem recently in the High Court in Bristol, and write about their experience in a joint article.

The full version of this article appears in the February 2014 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from