Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Complexities that can arise in relocation cases: immigration and problematic ISW input
Cordelia Williams, Barrister, Pump Court ChambersThis article helps to inform child relocation cases where immigration is a key feature. It includes a list of suggested immigration questions to...
Child sexual abuse and Family Court proceedings
Lucy Hayton Right to EqualityAllison Quinlan Right to EqualityDr Adrienne Barnett Brunel University London; Right to EqualityDr Charlotte Proudman Senior Research Associate, University of...
Scott Schedules and best evidence: fact finding hearings
Briony Palmer, 3DJBAmy Stout, 3DJBBriony Palmer and Amy Stout provide a practical guide to fact finding in private law, reflecting the enduring popularity of this topic in light of the prevalence of...
Last chance to book your table for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025
The LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 shortlist has been released, celebrating the exceptional talent and achievements within the entire legal community. This prestigious event will once again bring...
Are claims made under Sch 1 of the Children Act 1989 just for the ultra-rich?
Sally Harrison KC, St John’s BuildingsSally Harrison KC considers whether Schedule 1 claims are only for the ultra rich. In this article she addresses the hurdles which potential applicants have to...
View all articles
Authors

Prisoner wins right to father child by artificial insemination

Sep 29, 2018, 17:25 PM
Title : Prisoner wins right to father child by artificial insemination
Slug : 05-12-2007-prisoner-wins-right-to-father-child-by-artificial-insemination
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Dec 5, 2007, 11:41 AM
Article ID : 90029

Yesterday the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Britain had violated the right to respect for private and family life of a murderer and his wife by refusing them access to artificial insemination facilities whilst in prison.

Kirk Dickson was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1994. He met his now wife, Lorraine, in 1999 through a prison pen pal network while she was also in prison.

The couple requested access to artificial insemination facilities to enable them to have a child together, arguing that it was their only opportunity to have a child together because Mrs Dickson would be too old to have a child when her husband could be released. When they were refused access in 2001 they commenced legal action.

In April 2006 the European Court of Human Rights rejected their appeal against the then Home Secretary, David Blunkett. However the court's Grand Chamber overturned that ruling, voting 12 to 5 in favour of allowing the couple access to IVF treatment and awarded them €5,000 in damages and €21,000 in costs.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from