Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Fast, accurate Drug, Alcohol & DNA testing
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal...
Family Justice Council publishes ‘Guidance on responding to a child’s unexplained reluctance, resistance or refusal to spend time with a parent and allegations of alienating behaviour’
The Family Justice Council (FJC) has published guidance for Family judiciary, and those working in the Family Justice System, on responding to allegations of alienating behaviour.The guidance, which...
Children's Commissioner report: Deaths of children in need
The Children’s Commissioner has published a new report as to the deaths of Children In Need.‘Child in need’ is an umbrella term including looked after children, children on a child protection plan,...
NSPCC and others respond to the Sara Sharif verdict
On 11 December 2024 the CPS announced that Urfaqn Sharif, father of Sara Sharif, a ten year old girl, and stepmother, Beinash Batool, had been convicted of her murder. Sara’s uncle, Faisal Malik, who...
Allegations of inflicted injuries in children: is Omeprazole the new EDS? Dark corners of medicine, science, the unknown unknowns and the wider canvas
Tina Cook KC, 42 Bedford RowThis article considers the importance of medical and genetic research in shining light into possible causes of fractured bones in suspected non accidental injury allegation...
View all articles
Authors

Wrongful removal and retention – rights of custody

Apr 28, 2020, 15:16 PM
Title : Wrongful removal and retention – rights of custody
Slug :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Apr 27, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Nicholas Anderson and Anna Sutcliffe, 1 King's Bench Walk

A prerequisite to any successful application for the summary return of an abducted child under the 1980 Hague Convention is that the applicant parent holds and exercises ‘rights of custody’.

Nicholas Anderson and Anna Sutcliffe, barristers from 1 King’s Bench Walk, consider what ‘rights of custody’ means and consider whether an applicant need hold an order for the physical custody of a child or even live with the child before they enjoy ‘rights of custody’. 

The article sets out the circumstances in which rights of custody can exist and how the courts will determine the issue.

The article also considers recent case law on ‘inchoate rights of custody’ which may be held by a carer of a child who has no other legal rights and the circumstances in which rights of custody can be held by the court as the basis for an application by a parent for the summary return of a child under the Hague Convention 1980. 

Finally, Nick and Anna deal with the circumstances where the courts may find that rights of custody are being ‘exercised’, including by applicants who have very little physical contact with the child. 


The full article will be published in the May issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 

 



Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from