Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Beatson Cancer Charity receives £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs Giving Back campaign
*SPONSORED CONTENT*Leading drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs, has made a £500 donation to Beatson Cancer Charity in Glasgow as part of its Giving Back campaign. For every testing...
How law reform could help reduce domestic abuse for cohabitants
Graeme Fraser, William Sturges LLPIn this article, I consider how law reform for cohabitants could reduce the prospect of domestic abuse for those experiencing separation. My article endorses and...
Complexities that can arise in relocation cases: immigration and problematic ISW input
Cordelia Williams, Barrister, Pump Court ChambersThis article helps to inform child relocation cases where immigration is a key feature. It includes a list of suggested immigration questions to...
Child sexual abuse and Family Court proceedings
Lucy Hayton Right to EqualityAllison Quinlan Right to EqualityDr Adrienne Barnett Brunel University London; Right to EqualityDr Charlotte Proudman Senior Research Associate, University of...
Scott Schedules and best evidence: fact finding hearings
Briony Palmer, 3DJBAmy Stout, 3DJBBriony Palmer and Amy Stout provide a practical guide to fact finding in private law, reflecting the enduring popularity of this topic in light of the prevalence of...
View all articles
Authors

Wrongful removal and retention – rights of custody

Apr 28, 2020, 15:16 PM
Title : Wrongful removal and retention – rights of custody
Slug :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Apr 27, 2020, 23:00 PM
Article ID :

Nicholas Anderson and Anna Sutcliffe, 1 King's Bench Walk

A prerequisite to any successful application for the summary return of an abducted child under the 1980 Hague Convention is that the applicant parent holds and exercises ‘rights of custody’.

Nicholas Anderson and Anna Sutcliffe, barristers from 1 King’s Bench Walk, consider what ‘rights of custody’ means and consider whether an applicant need hold an order for the physical custody of a child or even live with the child before they enjoy ‘rights of custody’. 

The article sets out the circumstances in which rights of custody can exist and how the courts will determine the issue.

The article also considers recent case law on ‘inchoate rights of custody’ which may be held by a carer of a child who has no other legal rights and the circumstances in which rights of custody can be held by the court as the basis for an application by a parent for the summary return of a child under the Hague Convention 1980. 

Finally, Nick and Anna deal with the circumstances where the courts may find that rights of custody are being ‘exercised’, including by applicants who have very little physical contact with the child. 


The full article will be published in the May issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.

 

 

 

 

 

 



Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from