Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
CoramBAAF to host the Racial Justice Family Network to promote anti-racist practice
The Racial Justice Family Network (RJFN) is a collaborative network of individuals and organisations focused on promoting anti-racist initiatives and practices throughout the...
Family Law Awards 2024 announced
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2024 were announced on Wednesday 20 November at a glamorous evening event at the Park Plaza Westminster Bridge.The winners are as follows:Family Law Clerking Team...
Disclosure in public law Children Act proceedings: duties and limitations
Gemma Taylor KC, Barrister, 42BR BarristersAnn Osborne, Barrister, 42BR BarristersThis article explores disclosure within the sphere of public law Children Act matters. It considers the positive...
Domestic abuse and allegations of ‘parental alienation’: when pseudoscience enters the family ‘justice’ system
Dr Charlotte Proudman, Barrister, Goldsmith ChambersThe use of 'parental alienation' claims in family courts to undermine domestic abuse allegations is a persistent issue and a tactic often...
Re A: Post-adoption contact order: indicative of a new approach?
Laura Williams, Garden Court Chambers, Family Law TeamThe case of Re A, decided in July 2024, is a rare and possibly unique example of the Family Court making an order for post-adoption contact...
View all articles
Authors

Trapped in the million pound pad: self-determination, children's rights and relying on a child maintenance cheat

Sep 29, 2018, 21:35 PM
Family Law, divorce, Child Maintenance Service
Title : Trapped in the million pound pad: self-determination, children's rights and relying on a child maintenance cheat
Slug : trapped-in-the-million-pound-pad-self-determination-children-s-rights-and-relying-on-a-child-maintenance-cheat
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Aug 23, 2017, 03:11 AM
Article ID : 115586

Emma Gill
Vardags


The parliamentary review into the operation of the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) has highlighted some chilling facts. Children of wealthy parents are being left destitute. Rich parents, able to manipulate their income so as to exploit the rigid CMS formula means that assessments are being made at zero. These are children whose parents have fortunes rooted abroad, live from capital or have income which is does not appear on a UK tax return. A sophisticated income structure simply foxes the CMS system, resulting in a nil assessment.

The issue is compounded for those who depend on the other parent for housing. A court can only look at increasing maintenance once the CMS threshold is reached which mean the courts have the impossible task of making financial provision for a child, including housing, where the child's interest is the paramount consideration yet they cannot determine income unless the CMS threshold is reached.

The CMS also has only limited avenues for reassessment, the most important of which is 'lifestyle'. This means that the paying parent can enjoy super cars, yachts and the associated trappings of a superior income, but the CMS cannot consider this. Thankfully, the select committee has determined that this ground for appeal needs to be reinstated but this simply does not go far enough.


The full version of this article will appear in the September 2017 issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.


Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
money_house
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Load more comments
Comment by from