Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Prenatal Paternity Testing in the Family Courts
SPONSORED CONTENTCasey Randall, Head of Genetics at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the benefits of Non-invasive Prenatal Paternity testing for the timely resolution of family disputes.  Uncertainty...
The law on maintenance should be reformed to provide a formulaic approach
Rebecca Gardner, Winner of 4PB’s 2024 Financial Remedy Essay CompetitionThis article examines the challenges within the law of spousal maintenance in English family law, highlighting the...
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill: Children’s Commissioner’s Written Evidence
The Children’s Commissioner has submitted written evidence to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill Committee.This evidence builds on oral evidence provided by the Children’s Commissioner on 21...
Importance of due diligence: public policy in overseas surrogacy arrangements
Christie O’Connell, Barrister, 1 Hare CourtEmma Dewhurst, Senior Associate, Hall BrownChristie O’Connell, Barrister at 1 Hare Court and Emma Dewhurst, Senior Associate at Hall Brown,...
Disability as a section 25 factor
Naomh Gallagher, St John’s BuildingsDespite disability being a Section 25 factor in its own right, there is a dearth of resources specifically addressing the same. Often rolled into earning capacity,...
View all articles
Authors

Tax implications in respect of Children Act 1989, Schedule I trusts

Sep 29, 2018, 17:37 PM
Title : Tax implications in respect of Children Act 1989, Schedule I trusts
Slug : tax-implications-in-respect-of-children-act-1989-schedule-i-trusts
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 16, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88861

Jonathan Tod, Barrister, 29 Bedford Row and Jan Ellis, Tax Partner, Baker Tilly. New tax provisions hidden away in Sch 20 to the Finance Act 2006 abolish accumulation and maintenance trusts and mean that inheritance tax (IHT) is now payable in respect of any trust set up during the settlor's lifetime. The new regime also extends to trusts set up to provide a home for a child or children during their minority in Children Act 1989, Sch 1 proceedings. The Re P approach is no longer tax free.

The provisions are retroactive and will affect trusts set up before Budget Day 2006, which were structured as accumulation and maintenance settlements, and all new settlements executed after 22 March 2006. There are various different tax charges that can apply to trusts within the new regime. In this article the authors examine the tax charges, and the exemptions from them, in detail, identifying the requirements that must be complied with in order to avoid them. The new regime is illustrated with a worked example and ways of providing a home for children under Sch 1 without creating trusts are considered, and the tax implications of these explored. Concluding with some useful advice points for practitioners the authors warn that the potential liability to IHT charges for trusts imposed under Sch 1 proceedings must be managed unless and until Parliament is persuaded to amend the legislation.

For the full article see August [2007] Fam Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from