Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
AlphaBiolabs: The UK’s No.1 DNA testing laboratory for legal matters
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Casey Randall, Head of Genetics at AlphaBiolabs, explores what makes AlphaBiolabs the industry leader for court-admissible DNA testing. DNA testing plays a critical role in the...
Have your say in LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 Legal Personality winner
The Legal Personality of the Year award honours an individual (not necessarily with a background or qualification in the law) who has made an outstanding contribution in the legal sphere in the past...
Children’s Commissioner’s report on children's involvement in 2024 riots
The Children's Commissioner has published her report on the involvement of children in the 2024 riots.The report says: "Last July, the country was rocked by the murders of three little girls in...
Is a balanced holistic evaluation really that difficult?
Stephen Williams, St Mary’s Family LawIt is easy to lose count of the number of Court of Appeal decisions that emphasise the importance of both judges and social work professionals undertaking a...
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 shortlist announced
The shortlist for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 has been announced.The LexisNexis Legal Awards will be held at the Park Plaza Riverbank on 13 March 2025. You can book your table here.The shortlist...
View all articles
Authors

Family Resolution Research Report

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Title : Family Resolution Research Report
Slug : family-resolution-research-report
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Mar 20, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85801

The research report following the Family Resolution Pilot Project (FRPP )was published in March 2006. The FRPP ran between September 2004 and August 2005 in Brighton, Inner London and Sunderland. It was designed as a pilot scheme to assist parties involved in court proceedings about contact after separation or divorce. The main aim of the pilot was to help parents to reach an agreement about contact arrangements, and more broadly, to try to improve parental relationships. Domestic violence cases were not eligible for referral. The pilot had to be a voluntary scheme as it was not possible, within existing law, for courts to make compulsory referrals to the project. The scheme incorporated three components: an initial risk assessment at court, parent education groups led by Relate and parent planning meetings with Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) officers. Where appropriate, children could also be involved in the parent planning process. The aims of the study were to identify:

  • what were the outputs and outcomes of the pilot;
  • what, if anything, the pilot added over and above existing interventions;
  • what features of the pilot could, or should, be developed or generalised.


  • The number of referrals to the pilot was low, with only 62 referrals over the course of the year in the three areas. The gross referral rate, including all domestic violence cases, was 15%. The net referral rate, excluding ineligible domestic violence cases, rose to 20% of all applications. The analysis suggests that there was potentially scope to double the number of referrals if referral could have been mandatory. However, even with mandatory referrals, the overall number would remain small as a significant number of cases would have been unsuitable for referral .Only half of the referred cases completed the programme. See May [2006] Fam Law 412 for the full news article.

    Categories :
    • News
    Tags :
    Authors
    Provider :
    Product Bucket :
    Recommend These Products
    Related Articles
    Load more comments
    Comment by from