Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Spotlight on transparency: PMC (a child by his mother and litigation friend FLR) v A Local Health Board
Frederick Powell, Doughty Street ChambersMarisa Cohen, Doughty Street ChambersIn the case of PMC (a child by his mother and litigation friend FLR) v A Local Health Board [2024] EWHC 2969...
Nilsson v Cynberg and subsequent agreements: changing common intentions
Chris Bryden, Barrister, 4 King’s Bench WalkDaniel Wand, Barrister, 4 King’s Bench WalkThe issue as to how the beneficial ownership of land is determined is one which has frequently troubled the...
Finance special: how the 2024 budget is impacting family law
Sarah Higgins, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPSarah Jane Boon, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPMiranda Fisher, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPCharlotte Posnansky, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPThe Budget of...
The deprivation of liberty of children: what can we do better?
Pippa Pudney, Barrister, Spire BarristersThis article explores the principles of care for children deprived of their liberty including the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory’s recent recommendations...
Designation of Care and Supervision Orders: key themes and practical advice
Shiva Ancliffe KC, Coram ChambersCaroline Croft, Coram ChambersIn this article Shiva Ancliffe KC and Caroline Croft set out the law in relation to the designation of care and supervision orders,...
View all articles
Authors

Family Resolution Research Report

Sep 29, 2018, 17:06 PM
Title : Family Resolution Research Report
Slug : family-resolution-research-report
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Mar 20, 2006, 04:22 AM
Article ID : 85801

The research report following the Family Resolution Pilot Project (FRPP )was published in March 2006. The FRPP ran between September 2004 and August 2005 in Brighton, Inner London and Sunderland. It was designed as a pilot scheme to assist parties involved in court proceedings about contact after separation or divorce. The main aim of the pilot was to help parents to reach an agreement about contact arrangements, and more broadly, to try to improve parental relationships. Domestic violence cases were not eligible for referral. The pilot had to be a voluntary scheme as it was not possible, within existing law, for courts to make compulsory referrals to the project. The scheme incorporated three components: an initial risk assessment at court, parent education groups led by Relate and parent planning meetings with Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) officers. Where appropriate, children could also be involved in the parent planning process. The aims of the study were to identify:

  • what were the outputs and outcomes of the pilot;
  • what, if anything, the pilot added over and above existing interventions;
  • what features of the pilot could, or should, be developed or generalised.


  • The number of referrals to the pilot was low, with only 62 referrals over the course of the year in the three areas. The gross referral rate, including all domestic violence cases, was 15%. The net referral rate, excluding ineligible domestic violence cases, rose to 20% of all applications. The analysis suggests that there was potentially scope to double the number of referrals if referral could have been mandatory. However, even with mandatory referrals, the overall number would remain small as a significant number of cases would have been unsuitable for referral .Only half of the referred cases completed the programme. See May [2006] Fam Law 412 for the full news article.

    Categories :
    • News
    Tags :
    Authors
    Provider :
    Product Bucket :
    Recommend These Products
    Related Articles