Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Spotlight on transparency: PMC (a child by his mother and litigation friend FLR) v A Local Health Board
Frederick Powell, Doughty Street ChambersMarisa Cohen, Doughty Street ChambersIn the case of PMC (a child by his mother and litigation friend FLR) v A Local Health Board [2024] EWHC 2969...
Nilsson v Cynberg and subsequent agreements: changing common intentions
Chris Bryden, Barrister, 4 King’s Bench WalkDaniel Wand, Barrister, 4 King’s Bench WalkThe issue as to how the beneficial ownership of land is determined is one which has frequently troubled the...
Finance special: how the 2024 budget is impacting family law
Sarah Higgins, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPSarah Jane Boon, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPMiranda Fisher, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPCharlotte Posnansky, Charles Russell Speechlys LLPThe Budget of...
The deprivation of liberty of children: what can we do better?
Pippa Pudney, Barrister, Spire BarristersThis article explores the principles of care for children deprived of their liberty including the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory’s recent recommendations...
Designation of Care and Supervision Orders: key themes and practical advice
Shiva Ancliffe KC, Coram ChambersCaroline Croft, Coram ChambersIn this article Shiva Ancliffe KC and Caroline Croft set out the law in relation to the designation of care and supervision orders,...
View all articles
Authors

Equal pension rights to same-sex couples: Walker v Innospec

Sep 29, 2018, 21:39 PM
Family Law, pensions, same-sex couples, Walker v Innospec, Supreme Court
Title : Equal pension rights to same-sex couples: Walker v Innospec
Slug : equal-pension-rights-to-same-sex-couples-walker-v-innospec
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 27, 2017, 08:58 AM
Article ID : 115979

In Walker v Innospec Limited and others [2017] UKSC 47 the Supreme Court ruled that individuals in a civil partnership or a same-sex marriage must benefit from the same pension rights as those in an opposite-sex marriage. Pension rights that built up before 5 December 2005 had been excepted under UK law from the ban on discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.

The Government (and many pension lawyers) had assumed that the Supreme Court would uphold the cut-off date of 5 December 2005 for sexual orientation discrimination because the European Court had upheld a similar cut-off date (of 17 May 1990) in relation to sex discrimination. But the Supreme Court upset that assumption after a careful analysis of European law.

Family lawyers should bear this judgment in mind when advising a same-sex partner on what death benefits have been, or may be, payable from a pension scheme. They should check whether the pension scheme has unlawfully applied the 5 December 2005 cut-off date in making any payments or calculating any quotations. Individuals who have been discriminated against unlawfully following the death of their spouse or civil partner will in principle have a claim against the pension scheme.


The full version of this article will appear in the October 2017 issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Same_sex_couple
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles