Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
AlphaBiolabs: The UK’s No.1 DNA testing laboratory for legal matters
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Casey Randall, Head of Genetics at AlphaBiolabs, explores what makes AlphaBiolabs the industry leader for court-admissible DNA testing. DNA testing plays a critical role in the...
Have your say in LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 Legal Personality winner
The Legal Personality of the Year award honours an individual (not necessarily with a background or qualification in the law) who has made an outstanding contribution in the legal sphere in the past...
Children’s Commissioner’s report on children's involvement in 2024 riots
The Children's Commissioner has published her report on the involvement of children in the 2024 riots.The report says: "Last July, the country was rocked by the murders of three little girls in...
Is a balanced holistic evaluation really that difficult?
Stephen Williams, St Mary’s Family LawIt is easy to lose count of the number of Court of Appeal decisions that emphasise the importance of both judges and social work professionals undertaking a...
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 shortlist announced
The shortlist for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 has been announced.The LexisNexis Legal Awards will be held at the Park Plaza Riverbank on 13 March 2025. You can book your table here.The shortlist...
View all articles
Authors

Equal pension rights to same-sex couples: Walker v Innospec

Sep 29, 2018, 21:39 PM
Family Law, pensions, same-sex couples, Walker v Innospec, Supreme Court
Title : Equal pension rights to same-sex couples: Walker v Innospec
Slug : equal-pension-rights-to-same-sex-couples-walker-v-innospec
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 27, 2017, 08:58 AM
Article ID : 115979

In Walker v Innospec Limited and others [2017] UKSC 47 the Supreme Court ruled that individuals in a civil partnership or a same-sex marriage must benefit from the same pension rights as those in an opposite-sex marriage. Pension rights that built up before 5 December 2005 had been excepted under UK law from the ban on discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.

The Government (and many pension lawyers) had assumed that the Supreme Court would uphold the cut-off date of 5 December 2005 for sexual orientation discrimination because the European Court had upheld a similar cut-off date (of 17 May 1990) in relation to sex discrimination. But the Supreme Court upset that assumption after a careful analysis of European law.

Family lawyers should bear this judgment in mind when advising a same-sex partner on what death benefits have been, or may be, payable from a pension scheme. They should check whether the pension scheme has unlawfully applied the 5 December 2005 cut-off date in making any payments or calculating any quotations. Individuals who have been discriminated against unlawfully following the death of their spouse or civil partner will in principle have a claim against the pension scheme.


The full version of this article will appear in the October 2017 issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Same_sex_couple
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from