Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
LexisNexis Legal Awards: Entry deadline extended until 15 November
The LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 has extended its entry deadline until 15 November 2024. The LexisNexis Legal Awards offers a platform to celebrate the very best of the UK’s legal talent....
Breaking down barriers: creating family law seminars where there are no ‘stupid questions’
Jamil Mohammed, Junior Barrister, 33 Bedford RowChristina Warner, Barrister, 33 Bedford RowThe Family Law Breakfast Club was launched in January 2024 to provide junior members in family practice with...
NCDR and finding solutions collaboratively
Sarah-Jane Riddell, Solicitor, Collaborative Lawyer and Mediator, Family Law Partners This article provides an introduction to the collaborative process including how it works, when it...
The SIHIS Pilot Scheme: read John Vater KC MCIArb’s compelling article on Lexis+
The SIHIS Pilot Scheme: read John Vater KC MCIArb’s compelling and detailed analysis ‘The Suspected Inflicted Head Injury Service: Mixed Messages and the Price of Justice’– online now in Family Law on...
Resolutions Model Assessment tool – the widening gap between use by parties and application by the courts
Trisan Hyatt, Family Law Barrister, 5 Pump Court ChambersIona Gallagher, Pupil Barrister, 5 Pump Court Chambers The Resolutions-Model Assessment is most often used in care proceedings where there...
View all articles
Authors

Equal pension rights to same-sex couples: Walker v Innospec

Sep 29, 2018, 21:39 PM
Family Law, pensions, same-sex couples, Walker v Innospec, Supreme Court
Title : Equal pension rights to same-sex couples: Walker v Innospec
Slug : equal-pension-rights-to-same-sex-couples-walker-v-innospec
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 27, 2017, 08:58 AM
Article ID : 115979

In Walker v Innospec Limited and others [2017] UKSC 47 the Supreme Court ruled that individuals in a civil partnership or a same-sex marriage must benefit from the same pension rights as those in an opposite-sex marriage. Pension rights that built up before 5 December 2005 had been excepted under UK law from the ban on discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.

The Government (and many pension lawyers) had assumed that the Supreme Court would uphold the cut-off date of 5 December 2005 for sexual orientation discrimination because the European Court had upheld a similar cut-off date (of 17 May 1990) in relation to sex discrimination. But the Supreme Court upset that assumption after a careful analysis of European law.

Family lawyers should bear this judgment in mind when advising a same-sex partner on what death benefits have been, or may be, payable from a pension scheme. They should check whether the pension scheme has unlawfully applied the 5 December 2005 cut-off date in making any payments or calculating any quotations. Individuals who have been discriminated against unlawfully following the death of their spouse or civil partner will in principle have a claim against the pension scheme.


The full version of this article will appear in the October 2017 issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Same_sex_couple
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from