Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
CoramBAAF to host the Racial Justice Family Network to promote anti-racist practice
The Racial Justice Family Network (RJFN) is a collaborative network of individuals and organisations focused on promoting anti-racist initiatives and practices throughout the...
Family Law Awards 2024 announced
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2024 were announced on Wednesday 20 November at a glamorous evening event at the Park Plaza Westminster Bridge.The winners are as follows:Family Law Clerking Team...
Disclosure in public law Children Act proceedings: duties and limitations
Gemma Taylor KC, Barrister, 42BR BarristersAnn Osborne, Barrister, 42BR BarristersThis article explores disclosure within the sphere of public law Children Act matters. It considers the positive...
Domestic abuse and allegations of ‘parental alienation’: when pseudoscience enters the family ‘justice’ system
Dr Charlotte Proudman, Barrister, Goldsmith ChambersThe use of 'parental alienation' claims in family courts to undermine domestic abuse allegations is a persistent issue and a tactic often...
Re A: Post-adoption contact order: indicative of a new approach?
Laura Williams, Garden Court Chambers, Family Law TeamThe case of Re A, decided in July 2024, is a rare and possibly unique example of the Family Court making an order for post-adoption contact...
View all articles
Authors

Data Protection

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Title : Data Protection
Slug : data-protection
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 11, 2006, 10:46 AM
Article ID : 89161

Brenda Long and Emma Baillie, Solicitors, Blandy and Blandy, Reading. Eight solicitors have been prosecuted in the last 12 months for failing to notify under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA). Magistrates handed down a record fine in March 2005 following the successful prosecution of a Rochdale solicitor by the Information Commissioner. This is one of the high profile areas of data protection regulation of which many solicitors, and certainly partners, will be aware. However, family practitioners would be well advised to consider the offence of breach of s 55 of the DPA which has received far less publicity, but which carries similar penalties. Under s 55, an offence is committed when a person knowingly or recklessly obtains or discloses personal data, or the information contained within such data, or procures the disclosure of such information to another person without the consent of the data controller. There is some evidence that the Information Commissioner is taking a harder line in such cases and there have been a number of prosecutions in the last year.

The section is likely to be of most relevance to solicitors in circumstances where an enquiry agent is instructed to obtain information in relation to a third party, for example within ancillary relief proceedings or for the purposes of enforcement. Section 55 was primarily aimed at enquiry agents who specialised in obtaining personal information about others, at reporters pretending to be someone else in order to obtain personal information and also at employees obtaining information without the consent of their employer. However, there is evidence that the Information Commissioner is extending the application to solicitors who have received information in possible contravention of the section during the course of litigation. See October [2006] Fam Law 887 for the full article.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from