Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
The Thought Leader: time now to rethink
equality – will the future of family law
reflect the change in our politics?
Simon Bruce, Dawson Cornwell LLPThere is a switch on the dashboard of my car which I can press in order to reach a steady speed on the motorway. With no deviation, hesitation or variation.It’s very...
Re A: Post-adoption contact order: indicative of a new approach?
Laura Williams, Garden Court Chambers, Family Law TeamThe case of Re A, decided in July 2024, is a rare and possibly unique example of the Family Court making an order for post-adoption contact...
The Silent Revolution: ‘silver splitters’ –how to help meet their needs and expectations
Jo O’Sullivan, O’Sullivan Family LawMaeve Lucey, Solicitor, BindmansMelissa Arnold, Partner, BindmansJo O’Sullivan, of O’Sullivan Family Law and Melissa Arnold and Maeve Lucey, of Bindmans LLP,...
Good enough parenting in public law proceedings – what is it and is more than ‘good enough’ ever required?
Emma Vincent, Barrister, New Court ChambersThe term ‘good enough’ parenting has become a standard against which the court evaluates the ability of parents and wider family members to parent and care...
Domestic abuse and allegations of ‘parental alienation’: when pseudoscience enters the family ‘justice’ system
Dr Charlotte Proudman, Barrister, Goldsmith ChambersThe use of 'parental alienation' claims in family courts to undermine domestic abuse allegations is a persistent issue and a tactic often...
View all articles
Authors

Cohabitation: The long slow road to reform

Sep 29, 2018, 19:35 PM
family law, cohabitation, reform, property law
Title : Cohabitation: The long slow road to reform
Slug : cohabitation-the-long-slow-road-to-reform
Meta Keywords : family law, cohabitation, reform, property law
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Dec 5, 2016, 03:38 AM
Article ID : 113428
Professor Judith Bray, University of Buckingham

Currently unmarried couples have no right in law to claim ownership of each other’s property on relationship breakdown. This should be well known but there are still misunderstandings amongst many couples.

Cohabitants often believe that rights arise from a long relationship which is incorrect. There are no statutory rights protecting cohabitants on the breakdown of a relationship. Instead of statutory rights, cohabitants must rely on the complex rules of property law which are beset with technicalities. Their status as cohabitants has no effect on outcome and although the courts may take the length of relationship and other issues into account when quantifying shares, the claim to a share is a property law based claim. Couples cannot predict how the property rules and principles will apply to their individual circumstances.

This article examines the current position regarding property rights for cohabitants and demonstrates why reform is needed.

The full version of this article appears in the December 2016 issue of Family Law. 

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or any other titles, please contact the LexisNexis customer services team: Tel 0330 161 1234, or email: customerservices@lesisnexis.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
change
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from