An English High Court decision reported late last week has highlighted several real jurisdictional obstacles to producing a straightforward and obvious fair outcome. The judge had to overcome the 'technical' obstacles presented by the EU Maintenance Regulation. He used a statutory device described as an 'unusual' route normally used only by nonmarried cohabitants. En route he also covered the jurisprudential issue of needs and sharing in present English family law and how a court should deal with a marital agreement it has found is unfair.
After a long relationship with assets of about £11 million the husband argued the wife should have about £650 000. The court was satisfied a fair outcome was a starting point of one half. How could it produce as close to a fair outcome as possible despite the various obstacles?Introduction
Ever since the EU Maintenance Regulation was introduced in June 2011 there has been the prospect of different aspects of the affairs of a family on relationship breakdown being dealt with in different countries. The divorce pursuant to the jurisdiction under Brussels II. Maintenance needs pursuant to the...
Read the full article here.