Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce
and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email
emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
Thoughts on child rights and Brussels IIA after EU withdrawal
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Latvian children, care proceedings and Art 15
The case of
G and H (Children: Article 15 Brussel II Revised Regulation) [2018] EWFC 60 is a troubling one: including the parties, the children’s view (if appropriate) and operation of Brussels IIA after EU withdrawal. The first concern – only a minor point, but which must be mentioned at the beginning – is that though the case is reported the judge gave it no 6.1 certificate enabling it to be cited (see Practice Direction of 9 April 2001: Citation of Authorities Lord Woolf LCJ [2001] 1 WLR 1001 para 6.1; and see '
Precedent, or just a law report?' where the precedent/para 6.1 point is considered more fully). That said this note will set out and refer to the judgment.
Read the full article here.
