Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
Spotlight
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families: A Legal Handbook
More info
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity: Law and Practice
More info
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
More info
View All
A day in the life Of...
Read on

Nick Wikeley - Child Support: Carrots and Sticks

© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Date:6 OCT 2008

Nick Wikeley Professor of Law School of Law University of Southampton.

The holy grail of any child support system is the search for a culture of compliance. In an ideal world parents with care (PWCs) will seek to ensure that their children receive appropriate support from their ex-partners and non-resident parents (NRPs) will regard it as a badge of honour to meet their child maintenance obligations. The scheme established by the Child Support Act 1991 failed lamentably on both counts - there was no incentive for PWCs especially those in receipt of income support to co-operate with the Child Support Agency (CSA) while NRPs who failed to comply with maintenance assessments felt no shame and (very often) faced no sanctions.

In the October issue of Family Law I explained the Government's thinking behind the creation of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC) to replace the CSA and looked forward to the Mark 3 child support formula which is expected to come into force in 2010. This article examines the carrots and sticks in the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 (CMOPA 2008)...

Read the full article here.

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis