Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce
and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email
emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
Calderback to the future?
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Edward Floyd Senior Associate Penningtons ManchesPractitioners could be forgiven for believing that
Calderbank offers (without prejudice offers that are only admissible in arguments as to costs at the conclusion of proceedings) are an extinct species. However in the debate about legal costs in family cases there are growing calls from some corners of the profession for
Calderbank's reintroduction (either in full or in modified form). In a forthcoming article in the December issue of
Family Law Joanna Edwards and Charlotte Doherty explore in detail whether
Calderbank offers should be reintroduced or if not what the political alternatives could look like.
Against that backdrop the decision of Moor J in
WD v HD [2015] EWHC 1547 (Fam) has provided a timely reminder and clarification of the circumstances in which
Calderbank offers can still be used.
The question Moor J was faced with was whether a
Calderbank offer was admissible in determining the costs of an appeal against a financial order. The Family Proceedings Rules (as they were then) were amended in 2006 to introduce the current costs regime for financial applications under which the...
Read the full article here.
