Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
Spotlight
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families: A Legal Handbook
More info
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity: Law and Practice
More info
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
More info
View All
A day in the life Of...
Read on

Ashley Murray - Guidelines on Compensation: VP v JP

© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Date:28 AUG 2008

Ashley Murray Barrister Oriel Chambers.

Since Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [2006] 1 FLR 1186 there have been a number of High Court decisions which have thrown further light on the 'incremental approach' to compensation upon a divorce distribution. Both CR v CR [2008] 1 FLR 323 Bodey J and P v P [2007] EWHC 2877 (Fam) [2008] FLR (forthcoming) Moylan J have already received commentary at March [2008] Fam Law 198 and July [2008] Fam Law 614 respectively so the reader will be familiar with the judgments in question. However instructive though those cases might be both were decided before two decisions which are now reported and which it is suggested have actually now moved on the jurisprudence in this area - albeit to some practitioners not in a desired direction.

In both VB v JP [2008] EWHC 112 (Fam) [2008] 1 FLR 742 and B v B (Ancillary Relief) [2008] EWCA Civ 543 [2008] 1 FCR 613 the President of the Family Division...

Read the full article here.

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis