The penetrating judgement of Mostyn J in BP v KP NI and OI [2012] EWHC 2995 (Fam) indirectly shows up one of the real muddles of family law namely its attempts to adopt one set of legal principles - especially in terms of procedure - across the family law board. In BP v KP issue estoppel arose. A preliminary issue hearing was conducted by the judge in relation to whether the wife (W) could run an ‘add-back' argument based on the contested fact of the date of an agreement. That agreement formed the basis of settlement of separate proceedings between the husband (H) and a friend (NI) from which a substantial loss accrued. The date - before or at about the time of separation - might help to determine to what extent the court should regard that loss as ‘wanton' and attribute it to H. Was she estopped by her involvement...
Read the full article here.