Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Book your table for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025
The LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 shortlist has been released, celebrating the exceptional talent and achievements within the entire legal community. This prestigious event will once again bring...
AlphaBiolabs: The UK’s No.1 DNA testing laboratory for legal matters
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Casey Randall, Head of Genetics at AlphaBiolabs, explores what makes AlphaBiolabs the industry leader for court-admissible DNA testing. DNA testing plays a critical role in the...
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill: Children’s Commissioner’s Written Evidence
The Children’s Commissioner has submitted written evidence to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill Committee.This evidence builds on oral evidence provided by the Children’s Commissioner on 21...
Kinship carers call for government to provide a financial allowance
Over 30 kinship carers have marched and chanted their way through Westminster to the Treasury to call on the Chancellor Rachel Reeves to provide a financial allowance for all kinship...
Are claims made under Sch 1 of the Children Act 1989 just for the ultra-rich?
Sally Harrison KC, St John’s BuildingsSally Harrison KC considers whether Schedule 1 claims are only for the ultra rich. In this article she addresses the hurdles which potential applicants have to...
View all articles
Authors

Wyatt v Vince – Vindicating post-separation contributions

Sep 29, 2018, 19:42 PM
family law, strike-out, family proceedings, guidance, case management, financial remedy proceedings, wyatt, needs
Title : Wyatt v Vince – Vindicating post-separation contributions
Slug : wyatt-v-vince-vindicating-post-separation-contributions
Meta Keywords : family law, strike-out, family proceedings, guidance, case management, financial remedy proceedings, wyatt, needs
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Feb 6, 2017, 03:51 AM
Article ID : 113712

Philip Cayford QC and Simon Calhaem, 29 Bedford Row
Miles Geffin, Mishcon de Reya

The decision of the Supreme Court clarifies the law on strike-out in family proceedings and provides clear guidance to lower courts on the efficient case management of financial remedy proceedings.

Wyatt also explains why post separation contributions should ordinarily be vindicated, even following lengthy delay, and provides guidance on the quantification of the resulting award.  

But the decision also raises a number of unresolved questions. This article examines whether causality is a pre-requisite to a needs-based award and whether a contributions-based claim, which would ordinarily result in a sharing award, can also justify an award measured by reference to future housing need. It also explores whether contributions can warrant a free-standing compensatory award, also measured with reference to housing need.

The full version of this article appears in the January 2017 issue of Family Law. Online subscribers can access the article here.

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or any other titles, please contact the LexisNexis customer services team: Tel 0330 161 1234, or email: customerservices@lesisnexis.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
calculating_costs
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from