Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Over 100 expert violence against women and girls organisations issue letter of solidarity with Jess Phillips MP following misogynistic and far right attacks
Women’s Aid, alongside 100 expert violence against women and girls (VAWG) organisations, have issued a letter of solidarity to Jess Phillips MP following an onslaught of misogynistic and far right...
The changes needed in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, according to Children's Commissioner
The Children's Commissioner has reacted to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill: "As Children’s Commissioner, I want England to be the best place for children to grow up, where every child...
Is a balanced holistic evaluation really that difficult?
Stephen Williams, St Mary’s Family LawIt is easy to lose count of the number of Court of Appeal decisions that emphasise the importance of both judges and social work professionals undertaking a...
Disability as a section 25 factor
Naomh Gallagher, St John’s BuildingsDespite disability being a Section 25 factor in its own right, there is a dearth of resources specifically addressing the same. Often rolled into earning capacity,...
Non-existent children – a judicial dilemma
Mary Welstead, Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn July 2024, after three years of hearings and adjournments, Mrs Justice Arbuthnot handed down her judgment in AA v...
View all articles
Authors

Wyatt v Vince – Vindicating post-separation contributions

Sep 29, 2018, 19:42 PM
family law, strike-out, family proceedings, guidance, case management, financial remedy proceedings, wyatt, needs
Title : Wyatt v Vince – Vindicating post-separation contributions
Slug : wyatt-v-vince-vindicating-post-separation-contributions
Meta Keywords : family law, strike-out, family proceedings, guidance, case management, financial remedy proceedings, wyatt, needs
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Feb 6, 2017, 03:51 AM
Article ID : 113712

Philip Cayford QC and Simon Calhaem, 29 Bedford Row
Miles Geffin, Mishcon de Reya

The decision of the Supreme Court clarifies the law on strike-out in family proceedings and provides clear guidance to lower courts on the efficient case management of financial remedy proceedings.

Wyatt also explains why post separation contributions should ordinarily be vindicated, even following lengthy delay, and provides guidance on the quantification of the resulting award.  

But the decision also raises a number of unresolved questions. This article examines whether causality is a pre-requisite to a needs-based award and whether a contributions-based claim, which would ordinarily result in a sharing award, can also justify an award measured by reference to future housing need. It also explores whether contributions can warrant a free-standing compensatory award, also measured with reference to housing need.

The full version of this article appears in the January 2017 issue of Family Law. Online subscribers can access the article here.

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or any other titles, please contact the LexisNexis customer services team: Tel 0330 161 1234, or email: customerservices@lesisnexis.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
calculating_costs
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from