Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Beatson Cancer Charity receives £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs Giving Back campaign
*SPONSORED CONTENT*Leading drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs, has made a £500 donation to Beatson Cancer Charity in Glasgow as part of its Giving Back campaign. For every testing...
How law reform could help reduce domestic abuse for cohabitants
Graeme Fraser, William Sturges LLPIn this article, I consider how law reform for cohabitants could reduce the prospect of domestic abuse for those experiencing separation. My article endorses and...
Complexities that can arise in relocation cases: immigration and problematic ISW input
Cordelia Williams, Barrister, Pump Court ChambersThis article helps to inform child relocation cases where immigration is a key feature. It includes a list of suggested immigration questions to...
Child sexual abuse and Family Court proceedings
Lucy Hayton Right to EqualityAllison Quinlan Right to EqualityDr Adrienne Barnett Brunel University London; Right to EqualityDr Charlotte Proudman Senior Research Associate, University of...
Scott Schedules and best evidence: fact finding hearings
Briony Palmer, 3DJBAmy Stout, 3DJBBriony Palmer and Amy Stout provide a practical guide to fact finding in private law, reflecting the enduring popularity of this topic in light of the prevalence of...
View all articles
Authors

Wyatt v Vince – Vindicating post-separation contributions

Sep 29, 2018, 19:42 PM
family law, strike-out, family proceedings, guidance, case management, financial remedy proceedings, wyatt, needs
Title : Wyatt v Vince – Vindicating post-separation contributions
Slug : wyatt-v-vince-vindicating-post-separation-contributions
Meta Keywords : family law, strike-out, family proceedings, guidance, case management, financial remedy proceedings, wyatt, needs
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Feb 6, 2017, 03:51 AM
Article ID : 113712

Philip Cayford QC and Simon Calhaem, 29 Bedford Row
Miles Geffin, Mishcon de Reya

The decision of the Supreme Court clarifies the law on strike-out in family proceedings and provides clear guidance to lower courts on the efficient case management of financial remedy proceedings.

Wyatt also explains why post separation contributions should ordinarily be vindicated, even following lengthy delay, and provides guidance on the quantification of the resulting award.  

But the decision also raises a number of unresolved questions. This article examines whether causality is a pre-requisite to a needs-based award and whether a contributions-based claim, which would ordinarily result in a sharing award, can also justify an award measured by reference to future housing need. It also explores whether contributions can warrant a free-standing compensatory award, also measured with reference to housing need.

The full version of this article appears in the January 2017 issue of Family Law. Online subscribers can access the article here.

For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or any other titles, please contact the LexisNexis customer services team: Tel 0330 161 1234, or email: customerservices@lesisnexis.co.uk
Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
calculating_costs
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from