Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Customary marriages and their recognition in England: a legal overview
Ruth Omoregie, Associate Solicitor, Anthony Gold Solicitors LLPAU OneThis article explores the complexities surrounding customary marriages, focusing on their legal recognition and the possible...
Reducing conflict in divorce and dissolution by the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020: continuity, change or contrast?
John Haskey FAcSS AKC, University of Oxford, Department of Social Policy and InterventionThis article assesses some recently published statistics for 2022 on joint and sole notifications of...
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: an overview
Jack Harris, St John’s ChambersVivien Croly, St John’s ChambersUntil relatively recently, practitioners dealing with financial remedy work were rarely troubled by the issue of costs at the conclusion...
Case management: is a listed court hearing always necessary?
Stephen Williams, St Mary’s ChambersDDJs sitting in civil work undertake a large bulk of administrative work in boxwork.  This work realistically keeps the wheels of the County Court turning....
Pregnant women and the Court of Protection – when a pregnant woman changes her mind, does she lack capacity, and how do we know where her best interests lie?
Caroline Shields, Head of Court of Protection Team, Park Square BarristersThe decisions of pregnant women are always under scrutiny. But do cultural or political views about pregnant women give...
View all articles
Authors

Resolution response to FLBA/Bar Council Letter

Sep 29, 2018, 22:14 PM
family law, advocacy review, LASPO, legal aid, access to justice, FLBA, bar council
Title : Resolution response to FLBA/Bar Council Letter
Slug : resolution-response-to-flba-bar-council-letter
Meta Keywords : family law, advocacy review, LASPO, legal aid, access to justice, FLBA, bar council
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 20, 2015, 05:32 AM
Article ID : 109897
Resolution, and our partners in the family law community, have been holding detailed conversations with the Bar for some time regarding family advocacy work in the post-LASPO landscape.

It is therefore disappointing that the FLBA and the Bar Council have felt it necessary to ask the Minister to commission an independent review. We have not seen any evidence to support the need for this; and indeed, anecdotal reports from our respective members, including barristers and leading judges, do not demonstrate that the concerns expressed in this letter are widespread (and in many areas, they do not exist at all).

Resolution, together with our partners, are of the view that any quality issues are best addressed by the profession through training and accreditation for the Bar and solicitors. We wish to continue to work with the FLBA and the Bar Council to this end, as we have offered throughout.

At a time of significant challenge for legal aid practitioners, another review of the support they provide to vulnerable people is neither warranted nor helpful.

Resolution is currently working with our partners to provide a full response to the Bar’s letter to the Minister.

The FLBA and Bar Council letter is available to read here.

Resolution's response to the Minister is available to read here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
announcements
Authors
Provider : Resolution
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from