Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
CoramBAAF to host the Racial Justice Family Network to promote anti-racist practice
The Racial Justice Family Network (RJFN) is a collaborative network of individuals and organisations focused on promoting anti-racist initiatives and practices throughout the...
Family Law Awards 2024 announced
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2024 were announced on Wednesday 20 November at a glamorous evening event at the Park Plaza Westminster Bridge.The winners are as follows:Family Law Clerking Team...
Disclosure in public law Children Act proceedings: duties and limitations
Gemma Taylor KC, Barrister, 42BR BarristersAnn Osborne, Barrister, 42BR BarristersThis article explores disclosure within the sphere of public law Children Act matters. It considers the positive...
Domestic abuse and allegations of ‘parental alienation’: when pseudoscience enters the family ‘justice’ system
Dr Charlotte Proudman, Barrister, Goldsmith ChambersThe use of 'parental alienation' claims in family courts to undermine domestic abuse allegations is a persistent issue and a tactic often...
Re A: Post-adoption contact order: indicative of a new approach?
Laura Williams, Garden Court Chambers, Family Law TeamThe case of Re A, decided in July 2024, is a rare and possibly unique example of the Family Court making an order for post-adoption contact...
View all articles
Authors

President issues new guidance on McKenzie Friends

Sep 29, 2018, 17:28 PM
Title : President issues new guidance on McKenzie Friends
Slug : president-issues-new-guidance-on-mckenzie-friends
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 12, 2010, 04:45 AM
Article ID : 91165

Family DivisionThe Master of the Rolls and the President of the Family Division have issued new guidance on McKenzie Friends in light of the increase in litigants-in-person in all levels of the civil and family courts.

The guidance is intended to remind courts and litigants of the principles set out in the authorities and supersedes the guidance contained in Practice Note (Family Courts: McKenzie Friends, 14 April 2008).

The guidance sets out what a McKenzie Friend is permitted to do, for instance they may quietly give advice on any aspect of the conduct of the case but they may not address the court, make oral submissions or examine witnesses.

It makes clear the situations in which the court could refuse to permit a litigant receiving the assistance of a McKenzie Friend. Examples of circumstances where this might arise include where the McKenzie Friend "is using the litigant as a puppet", "is directly or indirectly conducting the litigation" or the court is not satisfied that they "fully understand the duty of confidentiality".

Litigants can enter into agreements to pay fees to McKenzie Friends for the provision of administrative assistance in or out of court, the guidance clarifies. However, such fees cannot be recovered from the opposing party.

The guidance also cautions judges not to justify refusing the litigant assistance because a McKenzie Friend "belongs to an organisation that promotes a particular cause".

Families Need Fathers (FNF) broadly welcomes this clarification and the greater recognition of the value of McKenzie Friends to litigants in person. However, they are concerned about paragraph 13 which provides for litigants to be denied the assistance of a McKenzie Friend.

Becky Jarvis, FNF's Policy Officer, said:  "We hope that [paragraph 13] does not limit or restrain the support that a McKenzie Friend can provide in Court which generally supports the efficient administration of Justice.

"We are pleased that remuneration is specified, although we believe that to further support the Litigant in Person, costs need to be recoverable if costs are made against the opposing party.

"This is an important step forward for users of the Court Service, who increasingly rely on McKenzie Friends in these difficult financial times," she added.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from