Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Blackburne House receives £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs Giving Back campaign
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Leading drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs, has made a £500 donation to Blackburne House in Liverpool as part of its Giving Back campaign. For every testing...
What are the intended and unintended consequences of the SiHIS pilot and report?
Jo Delahunty KC, Barrister, 4PBJames Holmes, Barrister, Garden Court ChambersOver six months into the Department for Education’s Suspected Inflicted Head Injury Service (SIHIS) pilot, its impact...
Disability as a section 25 factor
Naomh Gallagher, St John’s BuildingsDespite disability being a Section 25 factor in its own right, there is a dearth of resources specifically addressing the same. Often rolled into earning capacity,...
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 shortlist announced
The shortlist for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 has been announced.The LexisNexis Legal Awards will be held at the Park Plaza Riverbank on 13 March 2025. You can book your table here.The shortlist...
Revoking a will by marriage or civil partnership: an argument for abolition
Andrew Bainham, Emeritus Reader in Family Law and Policy, University of Cambridge A will is revoked by the testator’s marriage or civil partnership. The Law Commission has consulted twice on...
View all articles
Authors

Not a Bundle of Fun: the President's Direction on Court Bundles

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Title : Not a Bundle of Fun: the President's Direction on Court Bundles
Slug : not-a-bundle-of-fun-the-president-s-direction-on-court-bundles
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 26, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89185

Julien Foster, Barrister, Goldsmith Chambers. A new President's Direction (PD) in relation to court bundles came into force on 2 October 2006. It replaces the existing President's Practice Direction dated 25 March 2000.The purpose of the article is to set out the main provisions of the PD and how it differs from the previous Practice Direction. However, the article is no substitute for reading the detailed provisions of the PD itself.

The PD is over twice as long as the previous Practice Direction. It is far more detailed in its provision. While it has the advantage of clarifying certain ambiguities that existed in the previous Practice Direction and may well improve the quality of case presentation in court, it places a further significant administrative burden on solicitors and also on the Bar. Without wishing to make practitioners unduly anxious, the author has no doubt that an example will very swiftly be made of a practitioner's non-compliance with the PD in the form of a well-publicised dressing down by a High Court judge. Exactly this happened days after the last Practice Direction came into force, when Wall J (as he then was) launched into and made wasted costs orders against some poor unfortunate who had failed to provide preliminary documents.

The article is divided into sections as follows: differences between the old Practice Direction and the PD; additional brand-new provisions in the PD; frequently asked questions; and recommendations to practitioners. See November [2006] Fam Law for the full article. See November [2006] Fam Law for the full article.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from