Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Vulnerable clients: who are they, how do we identify them, how do we manage them
Sheena Cassidy Hope, Mischon de ReyaKelly Gerrard, Payne Hicks BeachThose working in the Family Justice system frequently encounter clients who present as vulnerable. Sheena Cassidy Hope and Kelly...
The impact of AI on family law practice
Graeme Fraser, William SturgesIn this article, I examine the impact of AI, including its uses; the challenges and risks posed by its increased adoption in family law; and the extent to which...
Family Law Awards 2024: book your table now!
The Family Law Awards 2024 shortlist has been released, celebrating the exceptional talent and achievements within the family law community. This prestigious event will once again bring together the...
Narcissism in family law – what you need to know and why
Karin Walker, KGW Family LawNarcissism has increasingly been used as a term to describe anyone who demonstrates difficult or undesirable behaviour. In reality it is a very specific personality...
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025: entries open with four new categories announced
The LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 are officially open for entries, offering a platform to celebrate the very best of the UK’s legal talent. This year’s awards will feature four exciting new...
View all articles
Authors

Not a Bundle of Fun: the President's Direction on Court Bundles

Sep 29, 2018, 17:19 PM
Title : Not a Bundle of Fun: the President's Direction on Court Bundles
Slug : not-a-bundle-of-fun-the-president-s-direction-on-court-bundles
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Sep 26, 2006, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89185

Julien Foster, Barrister, Goldsmith Chambers. A new President's Direction (PD) in relation to court bundles came into force on 2 October 2006. It replaces the existing President's Practice Direction dated 25 March 2000.The purpose of the article is to set out the main provisions of the PD and how it differs from the previous Practice Direction. However, the article is no substitute for reading the detailed provisions of the PD itself.

The PD is over twice as long as the previous Practice Direction. It is far more detailed in its provision. While it has the advantage of clarifying certain ambiguities that existed in the previous Practice Direction and may well improve the quality of case presentation in court, it places a further significant administrative burden on solicitors and also on the Bar. Without wishing to make practitioners unduly anxious, the author has no doubt that an example will very swiftly be made of a practitioner's non-compliance with the PD in the form of a well-publicised dressing down by a High Court judge. Exactly this happened days after the last Practice Direction came into force, when Wall J (as he then was) launched into and made wasted costs orders against some poor unfortunate who had failed to provide preliminary documents.

The article is divided into sections as follows: differences between the old Practice Direction and the PD; additional brand-new provisions in the PD; frequently asked questions; and recommendations to practitioners. See November [2006] Fam Law for the full article. See November [2006] Fam Law for the full article.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from