Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Customary marriages and their recognition in England: a legal overview
Ruth Omoregie, Associate Solicitor, Anthony Gold Solicitors LLPAU OneThis article explores the complexities surrounding customary marriages, focusing on their legal recognition and the possible...
Reducing conflict in divorce and dissolution by the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020: continuity, change or contrast?
John Haskey FAcSS AKC, University of Oxford, Department of Social Policy and InterventionThis article assesses some recently published statistics for 2022 on joint and sole notifications of...
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: an overview
Jack Harris, St John’s ChambersVivien Croly, St John’s ChambersUntil relatively recently, practitioners dealing with financial remedy work were rarely troubled by the issue of costs at the conclusion...
Case management: is a listed court hearing always necessary?
Stephen Williams, St Mary’s ChambersDDJs sitting in civil work undertake a large bulk of administrative work in boxwork.  This work realistically keeps the wheels of the County Court turning....
Pregnant women and the Court of Protection – when a pregnant woman changes her mind, does she lack capacity, and how do we know where her best interests lie?
Caroline Shields, Head of Court of Protection Team, Park Square BarristersThe decisions of pregnant women are always under scrutiny. But do cultural or political views about pregnant women give...
View all articles
Authors

Nick Wikeley - Child Support: the Brave New World

Sep 29, 2018, 17:27 PM
Title : Nick Wikeley - Child Support: the Brave New World
Slug : nick-wikeley-child-support-the-brave-new-world
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Oct 6, 2008, 08:46 AM
Article ID : 86603

Nick Wikeley, Professor of Law, School of Law, University of Southampton.

The Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 (CMOPA 2008) received its Royal Assent on 5 June 2008. Parts 1, 2 and 3 of the Act establish the framework for the redesign of the child support system following the Henshaw Report (Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), Recovering Child Support: Routes to Responsibility, Cm 6894 (TSO, 2006)). The 'Other Payments' part of the short title is nothing to do with child maintenance at all - it refers to Part 4 of CMOPA 2008, establishing a new no-fault scheme to make compensation payments to victims of the asbestos-related cancer mesothelioma, a policy matter which also falls within the DWP remit.

As explained in August [2008] Fam Law 787, some provisions of CMOPA 2008 are already in force (see CMOPA 2008 (Commencement) Order 2008 (SI 2008/1476)). Crucially, the requirement that parents with care (PWCs) on income support (or income-based jobseeker's allowance) must apply for child maintenance has been abolished with effect from 14 July 2008 (s 15 of the CMOPA 2008, repealing s 6 of the Child Support Act 1991). The benefit penalty under s 46 of the 1991 Act for those PWCs who fail to comply has also been abolished. So new claimants cannot be required to apply for child support and equally cannot be penalised for failing to do so. So far as existing benefits cases are concerned, those PWCs are still formally subject to the s 6 compulsion but any benefit sanction for non-compliance must be lifted from these cases. In addition, s 1 of CMOPA 2008 has already been brought into force for the purposes of appointing the members of the new Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission. Lastly, s 35, which came into force on 6 June 2008, confirms that Scottish minutes of agreement, registered in the Books of Council and Session (or the sheriff court books) for preservation and execution, have the same status as a consent order in family proceedings in England and Wales.

As yet, however, most of the new Act remains to be implemented - and when it is, it will make it even harder for the uninitiated to navigate their way around the child support legislative maze. Parts 1 and 2 of CMOPA 2008 are in the form of freestanding legislation. The overall framework for the new Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (C-MEC), which replaces the Child Support Agency (CSA), is to be found in Part 1 (ss 1-12). Part 2 (ss 13 and 14) deals with the transfer of functions from the Secretary of State to the new Commission. There is no express provision here for the abolition of the CSA itself, as that body was never mentioned in the Child Support Act 1991 (the CSA is an executive agency within the DWP, established by ministerial edict). At the time of writing it remains unclear as to when the CSA will shut its doors to new business and when C-MEC will start work, and whether this will be an overnight re-launch or a phased process.

For the full article, see October [2008] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from