Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
AlphaBiolabs: The UK’s No.1 DNA testing laboratory for legal matters
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Casey Randall, Head of Genetics at AlphaBiolabs, explores what makes AlphaBiolabs the industry leader for court-admissible DNA testing. DNA testing plays a critical role in the...
Have your say in LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 Legal Personality winner
The Legal Personality of the Year award honours an individual (not necessarily with a background or qualification in the law) who has made an outstanding contribution in the legal sphere in the past...
Children’s Commissioner’s report on children's involvement in 2024 riots
The Children's Commissioner has published her report on the involvement of children in the 2024 riots.The report says: "Last July, the country was rocked by the murders of three little girls in...
Is a balanced holistic evaluation really that difficult?
Stephen Williams, St Mary’s Family LawIt is easy to lose count of the number of Court of Appeal decisions that emphasise the importance of both judges and social work professionals undertaking a...
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 shortlist announced
The shortlist for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 has been announced.The LexisNexis Legal Awards will be held at the Park Plaza Riverbank on 13 March 2025. You can book your table here.The shortlist...
View all articles
Authors

Mr Justice Mostyn on the effect of coronavirus on the financial remedies courts

Mar 17, 2020, 17:48 PM
Title : Mr Justice Mostyn on the effect of coronavirus on the financial remedies courts
Slug :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : Yes
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Mar 17, 2020, 17:47 PM
Article ID :

In the light of the guidance this morning from the Lord Chief Justice (see below) I would like to ask all the zone leaders to propose to FRC judges the following measures.

1. First appointments should be done wherever possible using the “accelerated”  paper-only procedure in the fourth schedule to the FRC protocol (https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/FRC-Good-Practice-Protocol-November-2019.pdf). The terms of that schedule do not need to be followed strictly; judicial latitude is encouraged. Judges should accept consent orders dealing with first appointments routinely.

2. Parties should be encouraged to have their FDRs done privately. Such private FDRs should routinely be done remotely. Most barristers’ chambers and solicitors’ offices have facilities to enable FDRs to be done remotely.


The default position for other hearings is that they should be done either by Skype (Skype for Business is available on all judicial laptops) or by telephone. The extension of the existing virtual courts project is being actively investigated.

4. Physical hearing should only take place where this is absolutely unavoidable.

5. The physical lodging and handling of documents should be avoided. The use of ebundles should be virtually mandatory. See https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/financial-remedies-courts-e-bundles-protocol/

6. FRC judges should endeavour to do as much work as they possibly can from home.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
  • coronavirus
  • Family court
  • Financial remedies
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family Law (General)
Load more comments
Comment by from