Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
The Thought Leader: time now to rethink
equality – will the future of family law
reflect the change in our politics?
Simon Bruce, Dawson Cornwell LLPThere is a switch on the dashboard of my car which I can press in order to reach a steady speed on the motorway. With no deviation, hesitation or variation.It’s very...
Re A: Post-adoption contact order: indicative of a new approach?
Laura Williams, Garden Court Chambers, Family Law TeamThe case of Re A, decided in July 2024, is a rare and possibly unique example of the Family Court making an order for post-adoption contact...
The Silent Revolution: ‘silver splitters’ –how to help meet their needs and expectations
Jo O’Sullivan, O’Sullivan Family LawMaeve Lucey, Solicitor, BindmansMelissa Arnold, Partner, BindmansJo O’Sullivan, of O’Sullivan Family Law and Melissa Arnold and Maeve Lucey, of Bindmans LLP,...
Good enough parenting in public law proceedings – what is it and is more than ‘good enough’ ever required?
Emma Vincent, Barrister, New Court ChambersThe term ‘good enough’ parenting has become a standard against which the court evaluates the ability of parents and wider family members to parent and care...
Domestic abuse and allegations of ‘parental alienation’: when pseudoscience enters the family ‘justice’ system
Dr Charlotte Proudman, Barrister, Goldsmith ChambersThe use of 'parental alienation' claims in family courts to undermine domestic abuse allegations is a persistent issue and a tactic often...
View all articles
Authors

Use It or Lose It: Insolvency Act 1986, s 283A - Family Law journal

Sep 29, 2018, 17:31 PM
Title : Use It or Lose It: Insolvency Act 1986, s 283A - Family Law journal
Slug : fljcampbell300710
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 30, 2010, 09:29 AM
Article ID : 91403

JANE CAMPBELL, Barrister, 6 Pump Court

Bankruptcy has become an increasingly prevalent feature in ancillary relief proceedings. Many practitioners are familiar with the following scenario: husband and wife are co-owners of their home, husband goes bankrupt and under Insolvency Act 1986, s 306: husband's interest vests in a trustee in bankruptcy. The matrimonial home has little value at the time so there is no application by the trustee to sell it. Husband and wife then continue to live there and, over time, start to believe that the trustee's lack of interest means the home is theirs. Many years later, when the value of the property has increased, the trustee reappears and applies for an order for sale.

It was to counter the perceived unfairness of this situation that the ‘use it or lose it' provisions for trustees in bankruptcy were introduced by the Enterprise Act 2003 and incorporated into the Insolvency Act 1986. Broadly speaking, the position is that a trustee has 3 years to make arrangements to sell a matrimonial home or seek an order for sale of a property. If he fails to do so within this time, the property reverts to the bankrupt. A difficulty for the trustee is that if the value of the bankrupt's interest is less than £1,000 (in practical terms if the property is in negative equity) the court must dismiss any application for sale whereupon the interest in the property reverts to the bankrupt.

As we enter another period of economic uncertainty, it is timely that the Court of Appeal has provided clarification of the ‘use it or lose it' provisions in Lewis v Metropolitan Property Realisations Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 448, [2010] 1 FLR 86. In part, the ruling here assists the bankrupt but it also identifies an important loophole, namely, if a trustee in bankruptcy sells his interest to a third party, that third party is not similarly constrained by the legislation. Unlike a trustee, he may hang on seemingly indefinitely before selling a property, as the 3 year time limit does not apply to him.

To read the rest of this article, see August [2010] Family Law journal (link for online subscribers who have logged in). To log on to Family Law journal Online or to request a free trial click here.

__________________________________________________________________

Family Law

Family Law is the leading practitioner journal, ensuring all family law professionals keep up with the latest developments and their impact on practice. Each issue contains the latest news of legislative change, authoritative case reports, invaluable articles and news items written and compiled by experts for the practising family law professional.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from