Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 shortlist announced
The shortlist for the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 has been announced.The LexisNexis Legal Awards will be held at the Park Plaza Riverbank on 13 March 2025. You can book your table here.The shortlist...
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: an overview
Jack Harris, St John’s ChambersVivien Croly, St John’s ChambersUntil relatively recently, practitioners dealing with financial remedy work were rarely troubled by the issue of costs at the conclusion...
Revoking a will by marriage or civil partnership: an argument for abolition
Andrew Bainham, Emeritus Reader in Family Law and Policy, University of Cambridge A will is revoked by the testator’s marriage or civil partnership. The Law Commission has consulted twice on...
Non-existent children – a judicial dilemma
Mary Welstead, Visiting Professor in Family law University of BuckinghamIn July 2024, after three years of hearings and adjournments, Mrs Justice Arbuthnot handed down her judgment in AA v...
Disability as a section 25 factor
Naomh Gallagher, St John’s BuildingsDespite disability being a Section 25 factor in its own right, there is a dearth of resources specifically addressing the same. Often rolled into earning capacity,...
View all articles
Authors

Family justice on trial: Re A (A Child) [2013] EWCA Civ 1104

Sep 29, 2018, 21:48 PM
Title : Family justice on trial: Re A (A Child) [2013] EWCA Civ 1104
Slug : family-justice-on-trial-re-a-a-child-2013-ewca-civ-1104
Meta Keywords : family law, reform, justice, human rights
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Apr 9, 2014, 10:50 AM
Article ID : 105477

John Eekelaar, Emeritus Fellow, Pembroke College, Oxford:

In Re A (Intractable Contact Proceedings: Human Rights Violations) [2013] EWCA Civ 1104, [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming), reported at December [2013] Fam Law 1519, the Court of Appeal held that contact proceedings spanning 12 years in Sheffield County Court demonstrated a failure of the family justice system and violated the procedural requirements that are a part of the rights enshrined in Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, resulting in infringement of the rights to family life of the child and her father. Papers of the case were sent to the President of the Family Division and to David Norgrove, Chairman of the Family Justice Board, ‘in the hope that lessons may be learned for the Family Justice System as a whole'.

This article questions whether some of the characterisations of the issues made by the Court of Appeal are clearly supported by the account of the case in the judgment and, in view of empirical evidence about the way such cases are normally handled, whether it could not be better seen as a natural though rare occurrence within a properly operating system. It also questions the basis for finding a violation of Art 8, and the approach taken to the child's wishes.    

The full version of this article appears in the April 2014 issue of Family Law.

Online subscribers can access the full article here  

For all the information regarding the forthcoming reforms, visit our new, fully up-to-date Family Law Reform page with all the latest news, analysis, legislation and cases.    

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from