Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Customary marriages and their recognition in England: a legal overview
Ruth Omoregie, Associate Solicitor, Anthony Gold Solicitors LLPAU OneThis article explores the complexities surrounding customary marriages, focusing on their legal recognition and the possible...
Reducing conflict in divorce and dissolution by the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020: continuity, change or contrast?
John Haskey FAcSS AKC, University of Oxford, Department of Social Policy and InterventionThis article assesses some recently published statistics for 2022 on joint and sole notifications of...
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: an overview
Jack Harris, St John’s ChambersVivien Croly, St John’s ChambersUntil relatively recently, practitioners dealing with financial remedy work were rarely troubled by the issue of costs at the conclusion...
Case management: is a listed court hearing always necessary?
Stephen Williams, St Mary’s ChambersDDJs sitting in civil work undertake a large bulk of administrative work in boxwork.  This work realistically keeps the wheels of the County Court turning....
Pregnant women and the Court of Protection – when a pregnant woman changes her mind, does she lack capacity, and how do we know where her best interests lie?
Caroline Shields, Head of Court of Protection Team, Park Square BarristersThe decisions of pregnant women are always under scrutiny. But do cultural or political views about pregnant women give...
View all articles
Authors

Balancing Children's Welfare and Autonomy: the Health System versus the Justice System

Sep 29, 2018, 17:52 PM
Title : Balancing Children's Welfare and Autonomy: the Health System versus the Justice System
Slug : balancing-childrens-welfare-and-autonomy-the-health-system-versus-the-justice-system
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Mar 25, 2010, 11:16 AM
Article ID : 90907

DR WILSON CHENG, Specialty Registrar, Northern Forensic Mental Health Service for Young People

All children are entitled to be protected by society, particularly those who are in vulnerable positions. Under both the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (ECHR) and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989 (UNCRC), states have a duty to protect the life of every child. The UK government is committed to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. Under the Children Act 1989, when deciding the upbringing of a child the welfare of the child should be the court's paramount consideration. Section 100 also allows the inherent jurisdiction to be invoked by local authorities with leave, when necessary, for the protection of a child. It is clear that the society has an interest to protect all children from harm.

It is not a surprise to discover that both children and adolescents want to make decisions about their own lives as they grow up. Fortin suggested that the society should assist them by respecting their decisions as far as possible (J Fortin, Children's Rights and the Developing Law (Butterworths, 2nd edn, 2003), at p 71). However, it is unrealistic to expect all children of any age to make the ‘right' decisions for themselves even if they are developmentally ready to do so. Sometimes they might take some decisions, which could be harmful to others or even to themselves. For example, some teenagers make reckless decisions believing themselves to be immune from any dangerous outcomes.

To read the rest of this article, see April [2010] Family Law journal. To log on to Family Law journal Online or to request a free trial click here.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from