Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
LexisNexis Legal Awards: Entry deadline extended until 15 November
The LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 has extended its entry deadline until 15 November 2024. The LexisNexis Legal Awards offers a platform to celebrate the very best of the UK’s legal talent....
Breaking down barriers: creating family law seminars where there are no ‘stupid questions’
Jamil Mohammed, Junior Barrister, 33 Bedford RowChristina Warner, Barrister, 33 Bedford RowThe Family Law Breakfast Club was launched in January 2024 to provide junior members in family practice with...
NCDR and finding solutions collaboratively
Sarah-Jane Riddell, Solicitor, Collaborative Lawyer and Mediator, Family Law Partners This article provides an introduction to the collaborative process including how it works, when it...
The SIHIS Pilot Scheme: read John Vater KC MCIArb’s compelling article on Lexis+
The SIHIS Pilot Scheme: read John Vater KC MCIArb’s compelling and detailed analysis ‘The Suspected Inflicted Head Injury Service: Mixed Messages and the Price of Justice’– online now in Family Law on...
Resolutions Model Assessment tool – the widening gap between use by parties and application by the courts
Trisan Hyatt, Family Law Barrister, 5 Pump Court ChambersIona Gallagher, Pupil Barrister, 5 Pump Court Chambers The Resolutions-Model Assessment is most often used in care proceedings where there...
View all articles
Authors

Prenuptial agreements: the implications of gender

Sep 29, 2018, 21:02 PM
Title : Prenuptial agreements: the implications of gender
Slug : Ouazzani-FLJApril2013-421
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Mar 29, 2013, 01:30 AM
Article ID : 101995

Somaya Ouazzani

Solicitor, Kingsley Napley LLP:       

This article considers the gender aspects of prenuptial and postnuptial agreements.  It focuses on the practical realities of prenuptial agreements, in particular, the negotiating and bargaining positions of parties proposing to enter into such agreements and the actual effectiveness of the 'safeguards' espoused by the Supreme Court in Radmacher (Formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] 2 FLR 1900
 
The article argues that rarely are the parties' negotiating and bargaining positions equal, and it is more often than not, the female party who is financially disadvantaged as a consequence of not only signing the agreement, but having been impervious to the practical reality of its often intended, but sometimes unintended outcome.  
 
The article concludes by briefly looking at how these gender imbalances can be minimised to ensure that both parties always understand what it is they are entering into as a matter of practical, legal and financial reality.

The full version of this article appears in the April 2013 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from