Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Interim contact: do private and public law proceedings apply different criteria?
Simon Heaney, St John’s Buildings ChambersDecisions about interim contact are fraught with difficulty. Judges are asked to decide and sanction arrangements when they don’t have all of the information,...
Who is the true wife? The recognition of overseas marriage and divorce
Dr Ruth Gaffney-Rhys, Senior Lecturer in Family Law, UWE Bristol In Uchechukwu-Onwukibo v Onwukibo and others [2023] EWHC 2812 (Fam) the Family Division of the High Court had to...
Daniels v Walker – the baseline
Nick Power, BarristerJosephine Garvey, BarristerAn analysis of the court's approach to the instruction of single joint experts and second experts pursuant to Daniels v Walker within financial remedy...
Narcissism in family law – what you need to know and why
Karin Walker, KGW Family LawNarcissism has increasingly been used as a term to describe anyone who demonstrates difficult or undesirable behaviour. In reality it is a very specific personality...
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025: entries open with four new categories announced
The LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 are officially open for entries, offering a platform to celebrate the very best of the UK’s legal talent. This year’s awards will feature four exciting new...
View all articles
Authors

View from the President’s Chambers: the Process of Reform

Sep 29, 2018, 21:05 PM
Title : View from the President’s Chambers: the Process of Reform
Slug : Munby-MayFLJ2013-548
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Apr 30, 2013, 05:05 AM
Article ID : 102339

Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, reiterates the message being given as he embarks upon his tour of every care centre in the country. He discusses the reforms currently being faced by the family judicial system: the creation of the new single Family Court, the work done for the Family Justice Review by David Norgrove and improving access to and reporting of family proceedings with increased transparency.

He outlines the major challenges brought about by current reforms including restrictions on public funding in the field of private law and the two key reforms in the field of public law, namely, that care cases are to be concluded within 26 weeks and that expert evidence is to be restricted to what is 'necessary'.

He concludes by saying that neither the 26-week limit nor the new approach to expert evidence 'will prejudice the quality of justice'.    

The full version of this article appears in the May 2013 issue of Family Law.

 

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from