Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Are claims made under Sch 1 of the Children Act 1989 just for the ultra-rich?
Sally Harrison KC, St John’s BuildingsSally Harrison KC considers whether Schedule 1 claims are only for the ultra rich. In this article she addresses the hurdles which potential applicants have to...
The law on maintenance should be reformed to provide a formulaic approach
Rebecca Gardner, Winner of 4PB’s 2024 Financial Remedy Essay CompetitionThis article examines the challenges within the law of spousal maintenance in English family law, highlighting the...
To ward or not to ward: the curious case of the deceased parent
Oliver Latham, Park Square BarristersThose in practice before the introduction of the Children Act 1989, of which this author is not one, will recall the relative prevalence of the wardship...
Complexities that can arise in relocation cases: immigration and problematic ISW input
Cordelia Williams, Barrister, Pump Court ChambersThis article helps to inform child relocation cases where immigration is a key feature. It includes a list of suggested immigration questions to...
Importance of due diligence: public policy in overseas surrogacy arrangements
Christie O’Connell, Barrister, 1 Hare CourtEmma Dewhurst, Senior Associate, Hall BrownChristie O’Connell, Barrister at 1 Hare Court and Emma Dewhurst, Senior Associate at Hall Brown,...
View all articles
Authors

The developments in section 38(6) directions and instruction of experts

Sep 29, 2018, 18:34 PM
Title : The developments in section 38(6) directions and instruction of experts
Slug : Mahmood-DecFLJ2012
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Dec 13, 2012, 00:30 AM
Article ID : 100985

Safda Mahmood

Local Authority Solicitor:

This article considers the challenges facing those who seek a direction under s 38(6) Children Act 1989, so as to seek a further assessment, involving predominantly the child.

There is a consideration of the factors to be satisfied, as well as the practicalities of seeking viability assessments and timing of assessments. The major case law is considered and in particular, the need to take a holistic approach to evidence before the court.  

There is a particular discussion of the revised Practice Direction 25A (Experts and Assessors in Family Proceedings) which accompanies the Family Procedure Rules 2010, and the position with the costs of the assessment, pursuant to the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No 2) Order 2011, which sets out amongst other things, the details as to rates of payment of expert services.

There is also consideration of the recent High Court authority surrounding the position with the payment of expert fees in children proceedings, namely, the case of A Local Authority v DS, DI and DS (Through a Children's Guardian) [2012] EWHC 1442 (Fam), [2013] 1 FLR (forthcoming), whereby the President of the Family Division, Sir Nicolas Wall, has set out some very useful guidance in relation to what should be set out in court directions, and subsequently in the letter of instruction.

The full version of this article appears in the December 2012 issue of Family Law.

Categories :
  • Articles
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from