Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Family Law Awards 2024: book your table now!
The Family Law Awards 2024 shortlist has been released, celebrating the exceptional talent and achievements within the family law community. This prestigious event will once again bring together the...
New Kinship research reveals urgent need to improve financial support for kinship carers
A new report by Kinship, the leading charity for kinship carers in the UK, shows that a lack of financial and other support is stopping kinship foster carers moving to kinship arrangements outside the...
Victims Commissioner responds to stalking super-complaint findings
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), College of Policing and HMICFRS have published their findings in response to a police super-complaint submitted by the Suzy...
The SIHIS Pilot Scheme: read John Vater KC MCIArb’s compelling article on Lexis+
The SIHIS Pilot Scheme: read John Vater KC MCIArb’s compelling and detailed analysis ‘The Suspected Inflicted Head Injury Service: Mixed Messages and the Price of Justice’– online now in Family Law on...
LexisNexis Legal awards: two new categories for universities to enter
The prestigious LexisNexis Legal Awards 2025 are open for entries, and we are thrilled to announce two special categories designed to recognize the outstanding contributions of university law...
View all articles
Authors

LSC announce family tender details

Sep 29, 2018, 17:47 PM
Title : LSC announce family tender details
Slug : LSCfamilytender11082011-6321
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Aug 11, 2011, 11:15 AM
Article ID : 95445

TenderThe Legal Services Commission has announced details about its planned approach to procuring new face to face family contracts after the closure of its consultation on the subject.

Following the successful judicial review brought by the Law Society it was not possible for the LSC to introduce the Standard Civil Contract in the family category and instead the Unified Contract for Family was extended. This extension expires on 30 November 2011.

The LSC are seeking to implement a new contract with representative bodies for the delivery of family services commencing in February 2012 and intend to further extend the current Unified Contract for family until then.

The LSC has now confirmed that it will be allowing a four week period for providers to complete the tender using their e-tendering system. The planned timetable is:

  • 5 September 2011 - tender process opens
  • 3 October 2011 - tender process closes
  • Mid November 2011 - notifications of awards and requests for verification
  • Early December 2011 - verification documentation received
  • 1 February 2012 - contract begins

Following a review of the responses from the consultation, the LSC has also announced that the supervisor to caseworker ratio will be 1:4. This is the ratio which was preferred by the majority of respondents.

The consultation responses suggested that providers should not be required to undertake the full range of private law work and that this would cause particular problems for firms which specialised in children work. The LSC has decided it will therefore not be requiring providers to undertake the full range of work. Consequently there will be no need to distinguish between public and private family law work in relation to matter starts and successful tenderers will simply receive a contract to undertake any family work (with the exception of child abduction work which is subject to a separate tender exercise).

Tender documentation, including the Information for Applicants document, will be published on the LSC website when the tender process opens on 5 September.

Last year the LSC was strongly criticised by the Law Society and practitioners for its handling of the tender process. The chief executive of the Law Society's, Des Hudson, wrote to the LSC after it emerged that almost half of the firms tendering for legal aid family contracts were turned down. The tender process led to the judicial review brought by the Law Society.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from