Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2024
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Customary marriages and their recognition in England: a legal overview
Ruth Omoregie, Associate Solicitor, Anthony Gold Solicitors LLPAU OneThis article explores the complexities surrounding customary marriages, focusing on their legal recognition and the possible...
Reducing conflict in divorce and dissolution by the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020: continuity, change or contrast?
John Haskey FAcSS AKC, University of Oxford, Department of Social Policy and InterventionThis article assesses some recently published statistics for 2022 on joint and sole notifications of...
Costs in Financial Remedy Proceedings: an overview
Jack Harris, St John’s ChambersVivien Croly, St John’s ChambersUntil relatively recently, practitioners dealing with financial remedy work were rarely troubled by the issue of costs at the conclusion...
Case management: is a listed court hearing always necessary?
Stephen Williams, St Mary’s ChambersDDJs sitting in civil work undertake a large bulk of administrative work in boxwork.  This work realistically keeps the wheels of the County Court turning....
Pregnant women and the Court of Protection – when a pregnant woman changes her mind, does she lack capacity, and how do we know where her best interests lie?
Caroline Shields, Head of Court of Protection Team, Park Square BarristersThe decisions of pregnant women are always under scrutiny. But do cultural or political views about pregnant women give...
View all articles
Authors

Independent Social Workers angry over new court fees

Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Title : Independent Social Workers angry over new court fees
Slug : ISW30122010
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Dec 30, 2010, 12:17 PM
Article ID : 93305

MoneyOrganisations representing independent social work expert witnesses have written to the Justice Minister, Kenneth Clarke, to condemn his department's "flawed and irrational" approach to hourly court fee rates payable to expert witnesses.

Social workers were shocked to find that recent Legal Service Commission guidance on fee rates for professional expert witnesses in court cases excludes social workers. Despite advanced proposals to cap ISWs fees at Cafcass rates of just £30 an hour outside of London and £33 in the capital, the MoJ document reveals that nurses can expect to receive £81 per hour of court work, occupational therapists £68 an hour, a doctor £99 and a child psychiatrist £135.

Ann Haigh, Nagalro Chair, said: "This undervalues social work expertise and demeans the whole social work profession. The government needs to act speedily to preserve the availability of high-quality social work advice that courts rely on for making good and timely decisions for children".

The letter from BASW, Nagalro and independent social work agencies reminds the Minister that MoJ officials have publicly acknowledged that this decision was taken without evidence about the number and types of cases where ISWs are used, or any assessment of the impact on children of this serious loss of expertise. Independent social workers point out that comparisons with Cafcass officers are erroneous, especially as Cafcass now appoints newly qualified staff, who can have no claim to be regarded as experts by the courts. 

Two hundred of the most experienced ISWs have recently written to the MoJ to protest at disproportionate cuts in their fees as compared to other experts.  They say they will stop taking court-related work if the cut, which they estimate at 40-50%, goes ahead. This could further add to delays in children's court cases.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from